Roe v Roe

JurisdictionBelize
Year1985
Date1985
CourtCourt of Appeal (Belize)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Young, Sr. v Young
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 26 January 2001
    ...acts of violence of the nature that occurred in this case constitute cruelty on any reasonable definition of cruelty.” 34 However in Roe v. Roe (1985) 35 W.I.R. 92, it was held by the Court of Appeal in Belize under section 132(2) of The Supreme Court of Judicature Ordinance that then exist......
  • Dean v Dean
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 12 June 2003
    ...weighty a nature that should such other spouse be called upon to continue to endure it, would be detrimental to his or her health.” 7 In Roe v. Roe (1985) 35 W.I.R. 92 Sir James Smith P at p.96 said: “The decision whether or not the wife was cruel was a question of fact depending upon all t......
  • Procope v Procope
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • High Court (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 30 July 2003
    ...not justified. The accusations were not the result of provocation but were designed to hurt Mr. Procope for the sake of hurting him. In Roe v. Roe (1985) 35 W.I.R. 92 it was stated that in considering whether a petitioner for divorce has established cruelty as the ground for the grant of a ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT