Roe v Roe

JurisdictionBelize
CourtCourt of Appeal (Belize)
Year1985
Date1985

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Dean v Dean
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 12 June 2003
    ...weighty a nature that should such other spouse be called upon to continue to endure it, would be detrimental to his or her health.” 7 In Roe v. Roe (1985) 35 W.I.R. 92 Sir James Smith P at p.96 said: “The decision whether or not the wife was cruel was a question of fact depending upon all t......
  • Young, Sr. v Young
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 26 January 2001
    ...acts of violence of the nature that occurred in this case constitute cruelty on any reasonable definition of cruelty.” 34 However in Roe v. Roe (1985) 35 W.I.R. 92, it was held by the Court of Appeal in Belize under section 132(2) of The Supreme Court of Judicature Ordinance that then exist......
  • Procope v Procope
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • High Court (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 30 July 2003
    ...not justified. The accusations were not the result of provocation but were designed to hurt Mr. Procope for the sake of hurting him. In Roe v. Roe (1985) 35 W.I.R. 92 it was stated that in considering whether a petitioner for divorce has established cruelty as the ground for the grant of a ......