Patrick Reyes v The Queen
Jurisdiction | Belize |
Judgment Date | 2003 |
Date | 2003 |
Year | 2003 |
Court | Supreme Court (Belize) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 cases
-
Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor
... ... They are: (a) Watson v. The Queen ([para. 59] supra ); (b) Boyce v. The QueenUNK [2004] UKPC 32; (c) Matthew v. The StateUNK 004] UKPC 33; and (d) Reyes v. The QueenELR [2002] 2 AC 235. The first three decisions were rendered on 7 July 2004 and only ... ...
-
Carnegie (Keith), Daley (Renford), et Al
...in developing his arguments in relation to this issue, relied on what has become known as the trilogy of cases - Hughes [2002] 2 All ER 1058, Reyes [2002] 2 WLR 1034 and Fox [2002] 2 WLR 1077 which inter alia concluded that the mandatory death penalty was inhuman and degrading punishment,......
-
Attorney General Appellant v [1] Bernard Coard [2] Callistus Bernard [3] Lester Redhead [4] Christopher Stroude [5] Hudson Austin [6] Liam James [7] Leon Cornwall [8] John Anthony Ventour [9] Dave Bartholomew [10] Ewart Layne [11] Colville Mc Barnette [12] Selwyn Stachan [13] Cecil Prime Respondents [ECSC]
...function in the context of Section 3 (1). 66 Learned Counsel prayed in aid of his argument a statement by Lord Bingham of Cornhill in Reyes v The Queen29 to the following effect: "In reaching this decision the Board is mindful of the constitutional provisions….governing the exercise of merc......
-
Peart (Shabadine) v R
...was saved by that provision. 83 Are there binding authorities on this Court with respect to a discretionary death sentence? 84 In Reyes v The Queen [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1034 at p. 1045 Lord Bingham states the principles of constitutional interpretation thus: "... As in the case of any other inst......
Request a trial to view additional results